A conceptual model of a very efficient (possibly over-unity) energy system for the home. At its base, is the water fuel cell, which acts as both a high-efficiency water electrolyzer using no catalysts, but acts also as a fuel cell, when combined with the Electron Extraction Circuit (EEC). In this combination, the water fuel cell produces an electrical current by extracting the free electrons that are thrown off once the hydrogen & oxygen atoms are broken from the covelant bonds of the two H atoms. Both a charged gas, called HHO (or hydroxy gas), and an electrical current are produced with the water fuel cell. The HHO gas is a fully combustible compound that is perfect for combustion applications. Most internal combustion engines can be modified to burn it, however I chose the quasiturbine in this design, because if it’s efficiency & simplicity. I left out a compressor aft the water fuel cell, as the quasiturbine must run on compressed gas or other fuel, such as steam. The rest of the schematic is modular, and I imagine the alternator could be 350 KW, if powered by a 5L, 500 HP Quasiturbine, which should run well on the water fuel cell running in a continuous closed loop mode. The water supply would occasionally be replenished by tap water, or the system could operate using grey water. In addition, the water fuel cell can be used as a water purifier.
More here:
http://www.sustainableabq.com/plan.htm
For those who are developing their own clean energy and zero-point energy systems, or for those who would like to be involved with this promotion, please visit:
http://www.theorionproject.org
Duration : 0:8:19
[youtube JQeAPlKXu1A]
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Entropy owns you
Entropy owns you
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
It’d this system …
It’d this system works that’s awesome. It would allow for electricity to reach places completely off the grid. I’m confused though, where does the initial energy input coming from? Electrolysis of water requires a large amount of energy. Also, as Firewater already brought up, how exactly are you combusting an ionized gas? Moreover, wouldn’t it require a very large input of energy to ionize the hydroxy gas? How do you keep this high energy gas from simply reigniting early?
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Even with a WFC …
Even with a WFC with no pulse width modulation, you can still realize a net gain in energy output in the form of heat from the burning of the HHO gas. It’s jsut a matter of coming up with a good heat exchanger, and it looks like cooper is the key, jsut keep the flame from touching it.
We’re not only talking about an ionized plasma, it’s a composisiton of diatomic & monatomic hydrogen and oxygen. (listen to George Wiseman’s description). You have to explain the net gain in energy & ZPE is it!
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Meyers WFC was …
Meyers WFC was nothing to do with energy from the vacuum you said it yourself it was the EEC, think about it if you burn of electrons from oxygen it is no longer an atom as such, it is an ion, hydrogen can not bond with an ion due to electrical charge imbalance, (they are both positive at this point) hence the water molecule is dissociated, at least thats my understanding of it good theory though Matt
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
LET THEM KNOW WITH …
LET THEM KNOW WITH A FAX
If you think that clean energy should be the primary issue regarding future investments & job creation, then let our leaders know with a fax!
The Orion Project has set up a way for you to fax YOUR representatives, senators & the President about Energy-Related Issues.
Please Google: “Orion Project Fax”
Comments on YouTube are great, but sending a fax to your leaders is much more effective.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
antimatter is real, …
antimatter is real, it could be the worlds most efficient fuel source or the most dangerous bomb, thanks CERN.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Nice work in …
Nice work in progress, few bugs to iron out, but overall excellent.
100 years ago flying was crazy now we take it for granted. Few hundred years before that the World was flat. What is it that we don’t yet know is the place to focus, not what we already consider to be the limits.
Doubters might like to look up CERN and spend the time to fully understand what is being played out, very serious investment.
Every Inventor is considered a Crackpot until they succeed.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Ive come to realize …
Ive come to realize that a cavitation heater driven by a QT isn’t that efficient & it’s costly. An HHO heater might work if a good intermediary material is found that wont vaporize. For ZPE electric generation, many emerging technologies are about to hit the market. These are pulse motors similar in design to the Bedini Motor (e.g. Millennial Motor and TWM Motor). The stirling engine on the solar dish can be replaced with a thermoacoustic resonator
watch?v=Ro6f_nmJh0E&feature=channel_page
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Go, Go, Go, you hit …
Go, Go, Go, you hit a home run– get around the bases. Stop wasting time listening to how the ninny critics — critique your swing…… Run Baby Run.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
you make the car a …
you make the car a steam engine with pressured steam with electricity contacted to steam causing combustion
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
I drewl @ the …
I drewl @ the thought of the technological possibilities nowadays, absolutely magical! Wow!!
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
I agree. I made …
I agree. I made this over a year ago. It was to illustrate a few different over-unity devices & show in one unit. Solid state is much better, but you can still have moving parts and keep it reliable. Id ditch the Quasiturbine and use a Bedini/Newman/Brandt motor to turn the cavitation heater, and/or also supply energy. The newest version of the Papp engine is also a better idea. The water fuel cell is better suited for water purification or to run a car on.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
A few major …
A few major problems with this.
Stirlings, Hydrosonic pumps, motors, gearings are NOISY, SQUEEKY, LEAKY and unpredictable shits, these mechanical things wear off and require maintenable and oversight, not good for long time residental use, sorry this a wrong way to do this.
You need everything SOLID STATE, non-mechanical, non-gas phase, not noisy moving parts that break and fail etc.
But nice job with designs, planning and all.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Lets distinguish ” …
Lets distinguish “Perpetual Motion” from “Closed Loop Over-Unity.” Perpetual motion implies it moves forever, which is impossible because machines will break down eventually. WFCs are mostly solid state (no moving parts).
Google “PES Suppression.”
Energy from the Vacuum will take time to prove, but I really dont care how its explained. I only want these to become commercialized and available to everyone.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Have you seen the …
Have you seen the links, or looked at Xogen? Have you looked at Blacklight Power? The Bedini & Newman Motors are also over-unity & grab vacuum energy (”cold electricity).
Water Fuel Cells have been replicated and DO work and ARE over-unity. Google Bob Boyce D9 PDF & learn more. Academia rejects these devices because they are stuck in Newtonian Physics. Big oil & energy interests suppress this technology because they cant meter it or compete with it once decentralized.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
the quantum vacuum …
the quantum vacuum theory is not even proven fully… so no claims using this theory! and I just wonder, let’s say the big companied are against such discovery because of such and such reasons. Why is there not even ONE company/institution who would sponsor this idea and use it in the right way? At least the academic institutions would do something about it if it really worked… perpetual motion machines have always been proven wrong; but I hope his H2O energy source actually works!
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
How can you be so …
How can you be so sure that it is impossible? Maybe Faraday missed something. He never had 316L stainless steel or used PWM when he wrote the rules for electrolysis. Stan Meyer’s devices were well over-unity 700% efficient. Other groups (includeing H2Earth) are recreating these devices using no catalysts. The extra energy is coming from the quantum vacuum (heat untracable).
Before you decide to shun this as junk science, see my videos with David Wenbert, Xogen, Moray King & Steven Greer.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
in water cells, an …
in water cells, an electrical current supply is required in order to break the H2O molecule into H2 & O. where are you gonna get the current from?!! assuming that you got, the amount of electricity generated from reaction of oxyhydrogen gas is NEVER going to be efficient enoughtto make up the used current for water decomposition. if it did, it means that the efficiency is 100%!! & even if its resulting energy is even more, then we are generating energy out of nothing!! it’s impossible bro…
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Interesting video. …
Interesting video. It may not be completely accurate but it does give a lot of good starting points.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
There’s a lot I’ve …
There’s a lot I’ve learned about ZPE since I made this video. I would not use the Quasiturbine, because the HHO gas must be pressurized to work in the QT. I’d instead try a microturbine or use the gas to heat graphite up and take the hot air into a stirling engine genset.
An ever better option is to use the geovoltaic energy pump. This avoids the dangers of using gas on demand & is a much simpler way to generate electricity from the quantum vacuum (AKA zero-point energy, or ZPE.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
b.t.w. i wouldnt …
b.t.w. i wouldnt bother with the h2 cell. i would use a battery already charged with electricity preferrably charged from green sources.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
one way to capture …
one way to capture more energy would be to add a ‘cavitation motor’ ( watch?v=yh_-DUKQ4Uw&feature=related )
to the process, adding thermoelectric capturing devices to that. the pressure from the heated water would create steam power which could also be captured. you make that dude i want HALF!!
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Basing a home …
Basing a home system on a turbine is ridiculous and primitive. There are more effiecent ways to convert HHO to electricity.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
DANGER!: Attention …
DANGER!: Attention HHO people using LECTROLYTES!!!!!
Electrolyte systems are nothing more than electroplating units. They are NOT Stan Meyers systems. Yes they produce Hydrogen, but they also produce, CO2 and trace other gases due to the electrolyte. THE USED WATER IS POISONOUS! DO NT DRINK IT! DO NOT THROW IT OUT IN THE BACKYARD! IT IS TOXIC AFTER ELECTROLYTE IS ADDED. BE CAREFUL HOW YOU DISPOSE OF IT! STOP USING ELECTROLYTE AND LEARN HOW THIS PROCESS IS SUPPOSED TO WORK CLEANLY.
October 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
esse é uma merda
esse é uma merda