Comments on: Residential Water Fuel Cell Energy System (1 of 2)

By: RagingCaveman

RagingCaveman — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:19:24 +0000

DANGER!: Attention …
DANGER!: Attention HHO people using LECTROLYTES!!!!!

Electrolyte systems are nothing more than electroplating units. They are NOT Stan Meyers systems. Yes they produce Hydrogen, but they also produce, CO2 and trace other gases due to the electrolyte. THE USED WATER IS POISONOUS! DO NT DRINK IT! DO NOT THROW IT OUT IN THE BACKYARD! IT IS TOXIC AFTER ELECTROLYTE IS ADDED. BE CAREFUL HOW YOU DISPOSE OF IT! STOP USING ELECTROLYTE AND LEARN HOW THIS PROCESS IS SUPPOSED TO WORK CLEANLY.

By: diegohugosilva

diegohugosilva — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:19:24 +0000

esse é uma merda
esse é uma merda

By: ChemicalMikeUK

ChemicalMikeUK — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:19:23 +0000

b.t.w. i wouldnt …
b.t.w. i wouldnt bother with the h2 cell. i would use a battery already charged with electricity preferrably charged from green sources.

By: ChemicalMikeUK

ChemicalMikeUK — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:19:23 +0000

one way to capture …
one way to capture more energy would be to add a ‘cavitation motor’ ( watch?v=yh_-DUKQ4Uw&feature=related )
to the process, adding thermoelectric capturing devices to that. the pressure from the heated water would create steam power which could also be captured. you make that dude i want HALF!!

By: RagingCaveman

RagingCaveman — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:19:23 +0000

Basing a home …
Basing a home system on a turbine is ridiculous and primitive. There are more effiecent ways to convert HHO to electricity.

By: farazag10

farazag10 — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:19:22 +0000

in water cells, an …
in water cells, an electrical current supply is required in order to break the H2O molecule into H2 & O. where are you gonna get the current from?!! assuming that you got, the amount of electricity generated from reaction of oxyhydrogen gas is NEVER going to be efficient enoughtto make up the used current for water decomposition. if it did, it means that the efficiency is 100%!! & even if its resulting energy is even more, then we are generating energy out of nothing!! it’s impossible bro…

By: FearTurtles

FearTurtles — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:19:22 +0000

Interesting video. …
Interesting video. It may not be completely accurate but it does give a lot of good starting points.

By: mattimber

mattimber — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:19:22 +0000

There’s a lot I’ve …
There’s a lot I’ve learned about ZPE since I made this video. I would not use the Quasiturbine, because the HHO gas must be pressurized to work in the QT. I’d instead try a microturbine or use the gas to heat graphite up and take the hot air into a stirling engine genset.

An ever better option is to use the geovoltaic energy pump. This avoids the dangers of using gas on demand & is a much simpler way to generate electricity from the quantum vacuum (AKA zero-point energy, or ZPE.

By: farazag10

farazag10 — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:19:21 +0000

the quantum vacuum …
the quantum vacuum theory is not even proven fully… so no claims using this theory! and I just wonder, let’s say the big companied are against such discovery because of such and such reasons. Why is there not even ONE company/institution who would sponsor this idea and use it in the right way? At least the academic institutions would do something about it if it really worked… perpetual motion machines have always been proven wrong; but I hope his H2O energy source actually works!

By: mattimber

mattimber — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:19:21 +0000

How can you be so …
How can you be so sure that it is impossible? Maybe Faraday missed something. He never had 316L stainless steel or used PWM when he wrote the rules for electrolysis. Stan Meyer’s devices were well over-unity 700% efficient. Other groups (includeing H2Earth) are recreating these devices using no catalysts. The extra energy is coming from the quantum vacuum (heat untracable).

Before you decide to shun this as junk science, see my videos with David Wenbert, Xogen, Moray King & Steven Greer.