Is Capitalism the "Near Perfect" Economic System since it mimics nature?

Humans and all social animals have had a pecking order since day one, the product of millions of years of evolution…

It has proven itself time and time again in the form of successful species…

Then, the Liberal appears, an unwanted by product of Capitalism and threatens to destroy everything by elevating those at the bottom by artificial and unnatural means…

There is a definite reason that Liberals and Democrats hover near the bottom and evolution proves it…

Is keeping Liberals in check the solution to making Capitalism truly perfect, and "THE KEY to long term human happiness and survival?

.

Capitalism is the best alternative, that is for sure. None of the experiments in socialism or communism, or any other sort of centrally-planned collectivism have ever lasted more than about 70 years (USSR holds the record). Yes, the left all brags about how great places like Sweden and Norway are, with their socialism…but lets not forget a few things here : They are really mixed economies, not purely socialistic…they have only practiced these ways for about 30 or so years…they have tons of natural resources…and they have low, non-diverse populations. It will still be interesting to see how long even they can last. I am guessing they won’t last more than 20 more years or so before they have to change their ways. Sweden, for example, is already experiencing massive problems with large influxes of immigrants from the Middle East, sucking off of their social programs…we will see where this goes, and I am guessing nowhere good.

This entry was posted in one perfect system. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Is Capitalism the "Near Perfect" Economic System since it mimics nature?

  1. beren says:

    That worked well for the wooly mammoth
    References :

  2. aleister crowley says:

    Yes, capitalism is the only near perfect system, however, it still requires a certain degree of regulation to steer it in the right direction and keep it maintained and balanced(hence tariffs). I’m so sick and tired of socialist progressives being referred to a "liberal." There is nothing liberal about imposing government control on everyone. A true liberal embraces capitalism.
    References :

  3. TheOrange Evil says:

    I am a vehement supporter of the free market, but I don’t think capitalism is perfect. Neither is free speech, free religion or any other type of freedom. Freedom doesn’t promise outcomes; it’s just a means-based philosophy.

    Because capitalism doesn’t promise anything other than what it is–a free market–then it can’t fail to deliver on a promise.

    It’s when human beings interfere in your private life, economic, social or otherwise, that promises are made and rarely kept. They try to guarantee you results, but their central planning almost always does more harm than good. If you believe in a free market, it’s not just because capitalism is more efficient at distributing wealth to the most people, but also because you think freedom is inherently valuable.
    References :

  4. Tyler says:

    Capitalism is a liberal invention dum*ss
    References :

  5. Don't call me dude says:

    No, but it is a nearly-perfect con game.

    Beat the slaves, tell ‘em they’re free, give ‘em a chance to vote for someone who decries the beatings but won’t stop ‘em ("liberal") or, for periods when the slaves have been driven particularly-deeply into self-loathing and hatred by your propaganda, a chance to vote for someone who says beatings are good for you ("conservatives").

    Tie it all up with religions based on guilt, get rid of the Marxists, suppress labor, minorities, women, and the gays. Throw in a socio-political system that reveres a particular gambling method ("stock exchange").

    If you have enough cops and soldiers to keep everybody in line, you’ve got a guaranteed moneymaker!
    .
    References :
    "Look at them, Smithers. I’ve found the perfect business. They scuttle in, empty their pockets, and leave." — Montgomery Burns as a casino owner, "The Simpsons"

    "I can hire one-half of the working class to kill the other half." — Jay Gould, during the Great Southwest Railroad Strike of 1886

  6. Disco Stu says:

    Capitalism is the best alternative, that is for sure. None of the experiments in socialism or communism, or any other sort of centrally-planned collectivism have ever lasted more than about 70 years (USSR holds the record). Yes, the left all brags about how great places like Sweden and Norway are, with their socialism…but lets not forget a few things here : They are really mixed economies, not purely socialistic…they have only practiced these ways for about 30 or so years…they have tons of natural resources…and they have low, non-diverse populations. It will still be interesting to see how long even they can last. I am guessing they won’t last more than 20 more years or so before they have to change their ways. Sweden, for example, is already experiencing massive problems with large influxes of immigrants from the Middle East, sucking off of their social programs…we will see where this goes, and I am guessing nowhere good.
    References :

  7. Ddd Bbb says:

    in nature, species go extinct all the time

    if Capitalism mimics nature then we too will soon be extinct
    References :

  8. Paul Grass™℠ says:

    You bet ya it is the only system that works too
    References :
    Paul Grass, PhD Verminology
    Level 7 YA user/if in doubt check the level out
    May God bless you ,the USA and may God keep us safe from the progressive axis of evil;0bama,Pelosi & Reid

  9. A Left-Libertarian says:

    No. It goes against Primary human nature and creates a secondary nature. Those who support Capitalism are either ignorant or insane.
    References :

  10. longhaired freaky person says:

    Of course not. The Law of the Jungle is an irrational model for a rational species.
    References :

  11. Radman says:

    No…CAPITALISM is really feudalism. What you are trying to refer to is called FREE ENTERPRISE. The latter is a harmonious society of producers and products. The former is merely the manipulation of money (re: capital) to maximize profits with the minimal of effort.
    References :