Comments on: BUDDHIST DO NOT BELIVE IN HINDUSIM VISHNU AVTARE?

By: vajratara

vajratara — Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:20:59 +0000

It really makes me feel sad to read hindusim is claiming buddhism as hindusim my need is of correct and authentic knowlegde of Buddhism. To me Its Very important to have clarity about Buddha and about the Dhamma. The Buddha himself in his teachings of Kalam Sutta has guided to the kalams whem they went to him and asked him this qouestion "lord many people come to us and tell many different things and claim that what they are telling is the best, so we are confused and dont know whom we should beleive". The answer which buddha gave to kalams is worth consedering and reflecting as he has placed great confidence in human intelligence to test every thing even the words of buddha, as the goldsmith tests the gold, before you start beleiveing anything or giving it place in your life.kalam sutta is like the declaration of human Independence. and Kalam Sutta is the very answer to the question Buddha has given himself to everyone who says that Buddha was the avtara of vishnu or krishna or any other god or creator. If one believes oneself and his own experiences before trying to establish any view about Buddha or his Dhamma they should refer only to the Kalam sutta if not complete Dhamma teaching.
References :

By: SOMIT

SOMIT — Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:36:59 +0000

You are wrong.
Perhaps you should study a religion somewhat before going on a tirade about it.
hinduism did exist long before buddhism which you cannot deny.there are many scientific poofs of this.Many scientist or historian have proved it and reached to conclusion not just by mere imaginations but by using appropriate scientific techniques such as carbon dating of ancient texts, monuments , various astronomical proof etc. they have concluded that they belonged to 2nd millennium BC.

and many historians dated gautam buddhas lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE.

so you yourself compare the period.

infact sanskrit is the oldest language which was originated from hinduism.

for me teachings of buddism and hinduism are same. all the religions are same.To understand this one should study every religion thoroughly.

i have done lots of research on it, then i have reached to the conclusion.

i have witnessed many miraculous hindu saints and sages of india.

prophecies were foretold by various ancient saints of india who were
born long before lord buddha that lord vishnu would take birth/reicarnation as lord buddha in future.

all prophecies fore told are true because i have my self witnessed a prophecies foretold by an ancient sage/saint about a saint presently residing in puri (orissa).

vedas were developed by various saints and god for the benifit of humanity. They are believed to have immense energies, so in order to avoid the misuse of vedas they were written in coded word which would have different meaning. thus in kali yuga these texts were misinterpreted before the birth of gautam buddha.

When Buddha came, people were misinterpreting the Vedic Texts and were slaughtering animals.So Vishnu came as Buddha and decided to reject the Vedas created by him self. That way, they wouldn’t misinterpret the texts and kill animals if they disowned the Religion.

and more over aryans were not nomadic during the period of gautam buddha. there were many aryan kings, wariors with their well established kingdom during that period.

please make a proper research before passing comment on any religion.
References :

By: fatehate

fatehate — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:56:59 +0000

Buddhism originated in india not in china thailand.
References :

By: govind

govind — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:15:59 +0000

FYI, Like that of Buddha, even Rishabha, the first thirtankar of jain was considerd as an avatar of vishnu.
References :

By: V Reincarnated

V Reincarnated — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:05:59 +0000

Did Buddha bring anything new? He just took the renunciation path advised for the retired in Sanatana Dharma and advised it to all. Even the concept of Nirvana is taken from the Hindu concept of Moksha. Buddhists cannot win a debate based on Dharmic principles with Hindus. Who will give the Bhiksha if everyone renounces their householder duty and becomes a monk? The householder is central to Hinduism.
Lord Krishna is supreme and Bhagavada Gita is the sum and essense of Dharma. I don’t believe Buddha to be an avatar. Only appeasers do. Pusyamitra Sunga was great. Buddha was just an escapist who did not look after his family or his kingdom and lived off begging in the prime of his productive life. He did not attain enlightenment. All he found was a lazy, self absorbed way to live. Buddhism makes you a parasite who wants to benefit from society but not contribute to it’s well being. They are hypocrites who seek the protection of others but not fight for what is right and to defend the society they benefit from. Bddhism cannot create or sustain a society. Buddhism weakened people and was responsible for the advent of Islam through Afghanistan. What happened to the Bamiyan Buddhas? Where is Tibet now?
References :

By: ·!¦[·ρŖĨŋćë ŻúҚŐ ·]¦!·

·!¦[·ρŖĨŋćë ŻúҚŐ ·]¦!· — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:44:59 +0000

Bfor Buddha, Vedas and purana’s came,..they gave info, about Avatar’s of vishnu?,.then how come, you say Buddhism is different??
At the very outset, I may tell you that there is no polytheism in India. In every temple, if one stands by and listens, one will find the worshippers applying all the attributes of God, including omnipresence, to the images. It is not polytheism, nor would the name monotheism explain the situation. "The rose called by any other name would smell as sweet." Names are not explanations.
References :

By: rockstar

rockstar — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:03:59 +0000

hi you are right that both of them are different religions . both of them are different paths to god . ur info about snatan mat also known as the hindu religion is also correct . but your info about buddhism is not so .plz do some research about it as he believed in god . infact when he got enlightenment he found god .
References :

By: mrzwink

mrzwink — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:43:59 +0000

mahayana buddhists believe buddha’s in general to be an incarnation of krisha, avatar of vishnu. Theravade buddhists do not believe in any gods. Japanese Buddism is often combined with Shintoism, which makes belief in the divine spirits called kami a fact.

There are many different forms of buddism.

the faiths do overlap a bit and are not mutually exclusive… i dont quite understand your anger.
References :
Buddhist

By: qxzqxzqxz

qxzqxzqxz — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:24:59 +0000

Most Hindus accept that Buddhism is a seperate religion. But there will always be a handful of people who claim otherwise....
References :

By: Zen

Zen — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:34:59 +0000

Buddhism is not the same as Hinduism. Most people don't even consider Buddhism a religion, it's more a way of life.
References :