Is it logical or reasonable to deny the existence of God?

Just as, being adorned with numerous varieties of well-ordered flowers, the small hills in the plains and among the mountains each testifies to the necessary existence of an All-Wise Maker and points to His unity, and all together show the majesty of His sovereignty , so the great variety of the orderly shapes of all the leaves of the grasses and trees, and all their different stages and states and well-balanced and ecstatic movements again show the necessary existence and unity and perfect sovereignty of the All-Wise Maker.
Also, just as the regular development at the time of their growth of all living bodies, and each being equipped with all sorts of organs and their being directed consciously towards numerous different fruits again testify to the necessary existence of the All-Wise Maker and indicate His unity, and in their totality show on a truly vast scale His all-encompassing power, and all-embracing wisdom, and the beauty of His art, and the perfection of His sovereignty , so too souls and spirits being situated in all animal bodies, and their being armed in most orderly fashion with numerous sorts of systems and faculties, and their being sent on numerous different errands with perfect wisdom testify to the number of animals, indeed to the number, of their faculties, to the necessary existence of the All-Wise Maker and point to His unity. And in their totality they show most brilliantly the beauty of His mercy and the perfection of His sovereignty .
What do you think about it?

It’s not logical. Even top scientists agree.

This entry was posted in perfect balance system. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Is it logical or reasonable to deny the existence of God?

  1. Corbin says:

    Yes.
    Next!
    References :

  2. aaronmsl says:

    It’s both logical and reasonable.

    What is both illogical and unreasonable is yet another non-sensical argument from ignorance which magically concludes that YOUR god (Allah, in this case) created the world. Wow, what a coincidence.
    References :

  3. Blue Snail says:

    Yes. Yes it is.
    References :

  4. Adwait says:

    YES -IT IS LOGICAL AS WELL AS REASONABLE TO DENY THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. because,
    1st man comes and say " God is Love"
    2nd man " God is Light"
    3rd man "God is everything" (what is everything. Is there anything that is not in everything?)
    4th Man – God is Creator
    5th man – "Though I have been praying for the last millions of years, OH! God, why are you still hidden?"
    6th man continues so,
    So, A person of ‘being everything’ or ‘having some qualities, is only imagination.
    God, provide me health, wealth, relatives, happiness, pleasures, entertainments, and so on – man’s need has no stop and if he says that "God is everything" all questions become useless, as a happy /satisfied person need no God.
    So, when God comes, devil / satan would come on the other side.
    Besides, there is nothing that we get on our wish or pray. It made me believe that a person with every ability to execute everything is false. A god may be, but limited interest in the welfare of man and animals
    References :
    O

  5. Mia says:

    Yes, considering there is no real evidence for such an entity. I think what you wrote after the question is mostly gibberish.
    References :

  6. Airis of the Isle of mine says:

    Why does god have to be the only answer to why everything exists?

    what might other answers be?

    I think that it is much more logical and reasonable to say that god doesn’t exist since he is not my neighbor nor have I seen him on TV.

    Why does it have to be one maker, or a man?
    References :

  7. Rogue says:

    No it’s Human to deny and question GOD!
    References :

  8. Jin K says:

    Two words. Vestigial organs.
    References :

  9. Moin Khan says:

    53-Do u know; definition of the Almighty ?http://www.sultan.org/
    The Almighty’s chair is bigger than all the Universe and the Universe is just like a tennis ball under Almighty’s Chair; Arsh.
    [1] Say: He is Allah, the One and Only;
    [2] Allah, the Eternal, Absolute;
    [3] He begetteth not, nor is He begotten;
    [4] And there is none like unto Him.
    References :

  10. NaturalBornKieler says:

    When you see a river with its curves and slopes, do you seriously believe that someone dug it?
    References :

  11. ! says:

    i see a contradiction in your question
    and then noticed you are a top contributor in this matter as well.
    i give up.
    you sure youre not jewish?
    References :

  12. strivearth2 says:

    It’s not logical. Even top scientists agree.
    References :

  13. Kryten says:

    Yes.

    Thank you. Next?
    References :

  14. Tina says:

    It is logical and reasonable to deny all gods.
    References :

  15. P.K. says:

    yes it is wise to deny the complex sort of god you have outlined.

    there is no evidence for "the all wise maker" who is bestowed with "beauty", "mercy" or "perfection"

    ZERO evidence

    I am an agnostic atheist, so I will allow some possibility that the universe may have had some sort of *intelligence* as the prime cause

    just a *tiny* possibility

    but your whole argument can be boiled down to
    ‘this ecosystem is complex…. it is difficult for me to understand, so it must have been cause d by god (whichever god your cultural background worships)

    its the same argument that the Norse made when they said ‘Lightning…. I cant understand how that occurs, so it must have been Thor’

    or to put it in one word

    goddidit
    References :

  16. hmm_ says:

    tl;dr
    References :

  17. tat says:

    By stating the complexity of an organism (without even giving any sort of biological evidence), you aren’t proving the ‘need for an All-Wise Maker’.

    The way I see it, you’re just going through a very broad list of simple and complex biotic and abiotic factors, and claiming that in order to exist they need a maker.

    I’m sorry but that has absolutely no logical or reasonable explanation behind it, or at least you’re not supporting your claim ‘logically and reasonably’.
    Therefore, your argument is invalid.
    References :

  18. pete says:

    What you are saying is absolutely correct. This has nothing at all to do with any religion. It also has nothing at all to do with evolution.
    References :
    Agnostic

  19. Aparna M @ divya says:

    No… to both. you have no work.
    References :

  20. Persona says:

    When considering complexities, the astronomical variants assigned to those complexities; (i.e.)
    -The DNA-Rib
    -Functionality of the Iris/transfer of information to the brain.
    -Finger, Eye, Geometric Identification; All, indicate creativity.
    -The traceable Genome.
    -(not to mention)
    The fine-tuned use of the elements, to produce sentient life on the only "Garden Planet" in the known Universe. (once again: Astronomical variants.)

    These, and many other personal observations; leave me with little choice, but to believe in a Creator.

    G-d Bless.
    References :

  21. i aint know says:

    God exists apart from whatever his creation thinks or understands about him … at a base level all of creation knows god exists ..fallen man seeks to justify sin thru dismissing God .. doesn’t make it true …he merely makes an idol and worships it .
    References :