Comments on: PERFECT QUESTIONS PERFECT ANSWERS 4 [Prabhupada, Illuminati]

By: mukunda108

mukunda108 — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:37:22 +0000

* DESCRIPTION …
* DESCRIPTION CONTINUED: A man who is first-class trained up to become a brahmana, we accept him. It doesn’t matter whether he is India or Europe or America. It doesn’t matter. We are trying to introduce this system. That is mentioned in the Bhagavad-gita. Caste system means a man is born in a brahmana family, and if by habit he is fifth-class man, and he is accepted first-class man on account of birth.

By: mukunda108

mukunda108 — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:37:21 +0000

* DESCRIPTION …
* DESCRIPTION CONTINUED: Similarly, a person, very intelligent, he can be adaptable to all first-class habit, but because he is born in a sudra family, he is sudra. We want to stop this nonsense. We are picking up first-class brain and training up how to become first-class men. This is our business, not that introducing this rubbish thing.

By: AerialDeathFireStyle

AerialDeathFireStyle — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:37:20 +0000

god did not create …
god did not create everyone equally some are better than others i believe that but i also believe that you can judge a whole race or ethinic group like that. all im saying is taht there is a defference between individuals but not races as a whole. ( just to naemone characteristic thqat seperates humans)

By: mukunda108

mukunda108 — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:37:20 +0000

* DESCRIPTION …
* DESCRIPTION CONTINUED: No, we are not introducing. Otherwise how I am offering them sacred thread? Now just see. Anyone from India, he will understand he is a first-class brahmana. We are training like that.

By: spiderofdoom

spiderofdoom — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:37:19 +0000

Treating people …
Treating people equally gives them equal opportunity to show their true potential. How can there be differences between individuals but not races as a whole? For your statement to be correct, then some kind of racial stereotype would have to be true for an individual all the time, regardless of all other influences. If you’ve ever socialised beyond your own race then you can see that as self-evident in life itself. Every stereotype has been broken at some time, and not just individually.

By: spiderofdoom

spiderofdoom — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:37:19 +0000

Given some stats …
Given some stats showing a correlation between IQ and belief in God, I think it’s shown that a symptom of a highly intelligent man can surely not be faith in God. Sure, some smart people still believe, but not all, and a higher proportion of educated people (advanced in knowledge) are non-religious compared to the rest.

By: mukunda108

mukunda108 — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:37:18 +0000

Only fools don’t …
Only fools don’t believe in God. One must know that there is a controller. That is the beginning of knowledge. Why should you deny? In every field of activity we find some controller. How can I deny that there is no controller of this creation?

By: mukunda108

mukunda108 — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:37:17 +0000

If God was …
If God was controlled he wouldn’t be God would he?

God is fully independent, there is no other cause beyond Him. He is the cause of all causes!

By: spiderofdoom

spiderofdoom — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:37:17 +0000

who’s the …
who’s the controller of the controller then? and the controller of the controller of the controller? it has to reduce back to some stopping point somewhere. Your “rule” seems to end at God”, for me it stops a bit earlier. So why should you assume I’m a fool? Because I won’t take the short-cut by saying “God did it”?

By: martzoukos

martzoukos — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:37:16 +0000

People confuse …
People confuse thoughts with soul conscioussness. It cannot be explained. The particular master is fully enlightened, incarnation of krishna conscioussness there is no doubt, his whole face his presence is opening dimensions of light. That is intelligence.